Posts Tagged ‘ smart mobs

IBM Visual Communication Lab: Wiki “History Flow”

IBM is checking up on you! Well at least what people are doing on wikis. Check out their research concerning online author collaboration in wikis… history flow

Tags: smart mobs, social networks, visual information, Web2.0/Library2.0

I still find Twitter annoying…

Twitter this twitter that… the Smart Mob blog has a quick explanation of Twitter.

Smart Mobs » Blog Archive » Twitter explained: Boilerplate

Personally, I find Twitter extremely annoying… akin to people talking really loud and often. I can see the use of it, I just can’t keep up.

Tags: communication, smart mobs, social networks, Web2.0/Library2.0

RFID: Helping Patrons Make Book Choices?

Smart Mobs has a post about a German department store has ‘smart mirrors’ that note which RFID clothing is being tried on and then suggests other articles of clothing which may go with the outfit. Might this technology be used in libraries? Perhaps when a patron checks out an RFID book a list of related resources is automatically suggested to them?

I guess you wouldn’t necessarily need RFID to suggest other resources to patrons. Libraries could have their circulation receipts include a list of related items or something along those lines.

Smart Mob post: http://www.smartmobs.com/2007/10/22/rfid-tags-help-you-to-choose-clothes/

Tags: books, libraries, openworklibrary, smart mobs

Are Librarians Helping to Sink the Ship on Facebook?

Howard Rheingold the guy behind the concept of  “smart mobs” has dropped a rant about Facebook on his blog.

“I am getting half a dozen Facebook friend requests a day from people who claim not to remember friending me. When I complained in my status message, another Facebooker told me that the “Friend Finder” overrides user privacy settings and spams friend requests via users’ gmail contact lists. Between that and the really awful message board feature that renders groups near meaningless, I’m beginning to conclude that Facebook growth will start slowing, then stagnate, and eventually it will die a slow death. It’s too much work to respond to friend requests, too little ability to set my own boundaries, too many silly apps, and not enough return on the investment of my time. They seriously should have taken the big money when it was offered. If Facebook founders think they are going to be the “social operating system of the web,” they are delusional. They won’t even be AOL. It’s definitely an interesting fad at that moment, and if I ignore all demands on my attention, it can be a useful broadcast channel. But as an online social network, it’s sinking itself. “   – Howard Rheingold

I wonder with many librarians participating in Facebook as an outreach tool, if Facebook users are viewing librarians being there as spam in itself? As more often than not, I hear students say in regards to that other online social network Myspace, that it is “my-space!” not “your-space!”, so unwanted solicitations even from friendly librarians are not welcome.

Are librarians the spam of the online social network world?

For more info see:

http://www.smartmobs.com/2007/09/02/facebook-friending-spam/ 

Tags: digital natives, smart mobs, Web2.0/Library2.0

Microlearning: Another buzzword for the vault

A concept that the Smartmobs website has hipped me to is called Microlearning.  The Microlearning website (http://www.microlearning.org/) describes Microlearning as:

Microcontent is the kind of (very) small pieces (quite) loosely joined that emerged in the last five years, in the Web as well as in the mobile/cellular sphere.
The usual buzzwords — Smartmobs, Google Galaxy, Blogosphere, Web 2.0, Semantic Web … — all point to this fundamental phenomenon: microcontent circulation and resulting micromedia environments.

Further:

Microlearning emerges when new media keep breaking the world into work, knowledge, communications … all is falling into small digital fragments, loosely joined and permanently rearranging to form a multitude of new patterns, tasks and threads. We have to learn to live in the micro-cosmos.

So basically a student looking at a text message, podcasts, or a blog is engaging in ”microlearning”. Ever skeptical me, I am not quite sure I buy into this completely. It reminds me about all the unecessary the mumbo-jumbo surrounding Web 2.0 (and for that matter Library 2.0) but I am willing to keep an open mind about it.

What I gather is that Microlearning is derived from the small pieces of content on the web which come together to form larger wholes. Microlearning is seen to have a large impact on E-learning. E-Learning and distance education are important players in the library because much of the learning for those programs occurs within the library itself. Many students use library computers to access their distance education materials, write up papers,  and also to research homework assignments. The library thus becomes in some cases the surogate ”classroom” for distance education and E-learning.

What I think is interesting about the word Microlearning is that you can slap “micro” in front of other words to create new buzzword content (MicroContent, MicroEnvironments, MicroMedia, MicroTeaching). This is quite similar to all the hype created from Web 2.0 by simply adding ”2.0″ to something (Library 2.0,  Business 2.0, etc.) .

In any event, the modes of learning encompassed by Microlearning are something to pay attention to. Off the top of my head, I could see a screensaver or desktop game being placed on library computers which would ask users to put items in LC order or quiz users on library terminology. It wouldn’t have to be complex just something simple and small (or should I say micro), that would transfer some useful library knowledge to patrons. I think this is what Microlearning is all about.

 For more info on Microlearning check out:

Microlearning blog/website: http://www.microlearning.org/

Microlearning wiki: http://www.microlearning.org/MicroWiki.html

MicroMoments: http://www.theledge.com/micromoments/

Tags: games, microlearning, smart mobs